Richard Nixon’s Pardon Rhetorical Analysis

chair individual Gerald cut acrosss Par jade of Richard Nixon originator chairperson of the United States, Gerald R. fording gave a li very(prenominal) pardoning his predecessor, condition prexy Richard Nixon, of exclusively offenses in one case morest the United States that he may hand committed during his presidency. The announcement was suffer break d declargon feather on September 8, 1974. The legal transfer was pen to persuade the hoidenish to agree with the pardoning of Nixon and pardon him for the crimes he had committed against his country. traverse states that Theirs (Nixons Family) is an Ameri puke cataclysm in which we tout ensemble consecrate play a part. It could go on and on and on, or some oneness essentialinessiness write the end to it. I construct conclude that wholly I potty do that, and if I can, I must. chairperson hybridization argued that the pardoning of Richard Nixon isnt only for Nixon and his familys fate but for the countrys s well-being. Throughout traverses speech he films evident the use of Logos, Ethos and poignancy appeals. He uses the appeals evenly, convincing his hearing composition still being well- gageed and reason fitting. crosswalk opens up his speech with umpteen reasons why he, as the professorship and as a person, should be assumptioned, and that he thinks that what he is doing is the right wing affair to do in the situation. He event to choose that his job is a difficult one and that he has made mis fills in the past. Doing so helps him bond with his earshot and entirelyow them hit the hay that he, too, is a person, just cargon them and they can count on him, withal cognise as the ethos appeal. He states My customary insurance policy is to try and get all the facts and project the opinions of my countrymen and to take council with my roughly valued supporters. barely these rarely agree, and in the end, the decision is mine. This statement subtly creates the idea that the decision he had to come to was a hard one, and it ultimately came down to cut through having to take the responsibility. He proceeds to tell his country all of the options that he had, as if to restrain them know ilk they were a part of the act upon To procrastinate, to agonize, and to stop for a more favorable magical spell of events that may never come President Ford then makes himself seem very credible by promising to keep up the constitution, to do what God has asked him, and to do the very beat for America. In reservation himself credible, Ford establishes trust with his sense of hearing therefor qualification his argument easier to agree with. When he establishes his believability, he moves to the pathos appeal to introduce his thesis. He plays to the interviews senses by referring to Nixons situation as an American tragedy in which we hit all played a part someone must write the end to it. Thus reservation the hearing finger bad for Nixon and his fa mily, reservation his hearing know standardized they are at fault for their tragedy. He makes his thesis statement in a almighty way, face I have concluded that only I can do that, and if I can, I must. Imperceptibly making the audience thankful for taking apart their burden and making things right, so they dont have to. He again uses the listeners emotions and morals to support his opinion in order to create empathy for Nixon by referring to how the allegations have threatened his health and that he is right away trying to reshape his animation. He in uniform manner makes it obvious that Nixon spent most of his life in the service of this country, making Nixon a hero, not a criminal.This statement in any case institutes reliability for Nixon, correspondingly benefiting Fords argument. He continues to get fellow feeling from his audience by conveying that the situation they were dealings with was uncharted territory and they didnt bed how to resolve it. There are no historic or legal precedents to which I can turn in this matter, none that precisely fit the circumstances of a private citizen who has resigned the Presidency of the United States. By saying this, he lets the audience bang that the circumstances are fairly new, and he is the first to resolve them.This makes the audience feel more sympathetic for Gerald Ford and by admitting his faults the listeners would feel like they can trust him more. The President goes on to say But it is common knowledge that serious allegations and accusations cleave like a sword eachwhere our origin Presidents intellect After Ford had established savvy for himself, he makes this statement to show the audience that Nixon is withal dealing with guilt and rue for what he did to his country.By referring to Richard Nixon as former President it brings attention to the fact that Nixon was once a President of The United States, and that he should be respected and possibly even forgiven because he was on ce in charge of the country and was once trusted by the broad(a) country. Gerald Ford usesthe logic of his reasons, and the effectiveness of its reenforcement evidence to convey why it is so important that he pardons Nixon now, rather than let the sovereign Court deal with the matter.He announces, many months and perhaps more years leave have to pass before Richard Nixon could stimulate a fair trial by jury in any jurisdiction of the United States under governing decisions of the Supreme Court. He uses the Supreme Court, the highest of all lawcourts, to support his claim that pardoning Nixon was the best decision and he does this by affirming that the Supreme Court would take too long and if they couldnt make a decision, no other court in the United States would be able to make a decision. Making it real that he is the best option and zipper else would suffice.Later in the speech President Ford also brings forward the idea that, if the process of fair trial were to be broug ht out, the check would only open old wounds and the plenty would only be polarized in their own opinions. This statement was said to make the listeners feel as if their negative opinions, if any, of Richard Nixon were strong and unnecessary. It also makes the audience know that Gerald Ford is honoring out for them and he realizes they are combat injury, and doesnt want the situation to continue to hurt him. By saying these things, the peoples feelings of trust and faith in the electric chair are confirmed. I deeply confide in equal justice for all Americans, whatever their station or former station. After possibly differing with the audience in the previous statement, Ford uses this to restore his credibility with the people and prepare them for more facts and reasons why he formed his opinion. Gerald Ford influences the audience again by using emotion to guilt-trip them into feeling sorrow for Nixon by saying it is not the ultimate fate of Richard Nixon that most concerns me, though surely it deeply troubles every decent and every compassionate person. facial expression that a decent and compassionate person should care about what happens to Nixon makes the audience feel like they, too, should care about his fate. And doing so would restore the need for them to feel that they are a compassionate and decent human being. In this, I dare do not depend upon my personal sympathy as a long-time friend of the former President, nor my professional judgment as a lawyer, and I do not. This statement tells the audience that he sees both sides of the argument.Because of his background, as a lawyer and as a friend of former President Nixon, he is force to see the logical side and the aroused side. Therefore, it seems as if the decision President Ford has to make is going to be made in a thoughtful and all-round(prenominal) way. As President, my primary concern must always be the peachyest fair of all the people of the United States who servant I am. S aying that he is a servant to his country seems as if he is saying that the decision isnt only his, and he is trying to do what is best for his country, and what his country would think is best in the situation.The statement implies that he wouldnt do any harm to his country and if he is an honorable man, like he has already convinced the audience, then he should be trusted with this decision also. President Gerald Ford proceeds to talk about how his conscience is telling him to make this choice and that it is his duty, as President of the United States, to firmly keep out and seal this book. This statement made the audience feel like the pardoning of Richard Nixon is an honorable thing, and that Gerald Ford is brave to do it.It also implies, by bringing up his conscience, that he listens to his upcountry thoughts and always tries to do the right thing and this is something he does regularly. By doing this he once again makes the audience see that he is a credible and honest man. Gerald Ford felt that Richard Nixon and his loved ones have suffered fair to middling The use of the phrase loved ones alternatively of the word family makes a strong connectedness with the audience and makes Nixon look more penetrable and innocent. Ford then takes emolument of the enthusiasm towards Nixon and says we, as a great and goodness nation, can come unneurotic and make his goal of peace come true. The reflection of the people as a great and good nation brings the audience together and brings forth the idea that we are all in this together, making Fords opinion seem like it was the entire audiences, too. Also, pointing out that Nixon had a goal of peace makes him, again, look like a very respectable man, which reflects well on President Ford. Gerald Ford uses the right amount of emotions, facts and credibility to endorse his opinion, and he does it very well without fault. He plays on the audiences emotions through making them sympathetic for Nixon by pointing out hi s losses.Ford uses the facts of Richard Nixons trial to make his decision more reasonable. He also uses his credibility to establish trust. He influences the knockouts opinions very discreetly, so the audience conform their opinion to his without realizing it. Overall, Gerald Ford does a really good job talking to his audience and making them feel like a part of his decision. He uses the appeals to his advantage and wins the audience over making it easier for them to imagine that he is making the right decision.