Tuesday, March 5, 2019

What Considerations Are Relevant?

Business Ethics Midterm Essays 10/23/2012 What considerations are relevant when we assign blame for injurious acts? What is the distinction mingled with excusing conditions and mitigating circumstances? Some say that deterrent example responsibility is directed towards doing what is right on and what is haywire. Well that is non necessarily the case moral responsibility brook also be aimed at at determining whether a some iodin is virtuously responsible for doing something morally wrong. This is known as blame. Blame and moral responsibility can be used interchangeably.If someone is to be blame for a wrong doing than that somebody is also held morally responsible for that wrong doing. Not all people are responsible for their wrongful or injurious acts. Injurious acts are harmful acts that one let loosely and intimately intends to do. People have to consider the circumstances under which the mortal was morally right or morally wrong for their actions. Excusing conditions a re conditions under which a person causes an injury on accident and is excused from blame and should not be held morally responsible. There are 3 considerations under which a person is not held morally responsible for an injury or a wrong.One is not held responsible if one did not cause or could not prevent the injury, one did not know he was inflicting injury, and if one did not inflict the injury out of his own free will. When a person is morally responsible for an act of injury or wrong doing in that location are also 3 things to consider. A person is held responsible if one caused or helped cause it, or failed to prevent it, one did so knowing what he or she was doing and if one did so out of his out free will. Excusing is when a persons moral responsibility is excused by the absence of causality, knowledge and freedom.Mitigating factors can diminish a persons moral responsibly still it depends on how severe the injury or wrong is. In addition to the excusing conditions, the re are also 3 mitigating factions that can lessen moral responsibility. One circumstance leaves a person uncertain about what he or shit is doing. Another makes it difficult, but not impossible for the person to avoid doing it. The third circumstance minimizes a persons involvement in an act. In general, the more earnest the injury is, the less the mitigating circumstances will diminish responsibility.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.